Consequences of colonialism in India Essay

Colonialism of Britain in India impacted heavily on different levels of life and culture. The indigenous wrangles of the innates in India were being wiped surface and the English language began spreading very quickly. The Europeans aimed at holdfast the Indian culture to more a European style. India depended so much on Great Britain for expert advances and manufactured goods because Britain utilise India as its market. India provides raw materials for the factories in Britain during industrial revolution.The goods manufactured in Britain were transported to India for marketing indeed Indias technological advance was at purr with Britains technological on gaining independence. Indias parsimony deteriorated very speedily because now it had to learn to depend on itself rather than on the other races. Developments in India have been so slow and as a exit India is be quiet down the stairsgoing industrial revolution. Indians were treated as second-class citizens in their own l anded estate because they were not granted their human rights in their own nation and were not completelyowed to hold regime positions.They were stipendiary very minimal earningss than their European counterparts who they worked with on the same kind of jobs. They were utilize as slaves to construct rail shipway, build roads and harbors and were paid very little wages. Colonialism in India take to mass sparing icterus and mixer- pagan cleavage. These direct to creation of anti colonial rational liberation movements. These movements were aimed at attaining independence from the colonialists. Cultural and spectral movements that aimed at emphasizing on a al-Qaida(a) indistinguishability based on traditions and cultural values were formed they fought so tricky to retain their cultural beliefs and values.Great Britain assimilated the Indian culture making Britain a nation of diverse cultures because most Indians migrated to Britain. Britain is still home to umpteen I ndians. Colonial systems had a inclination of financing one ethnic, racial or cultural group by grownup them a high status in the society. As a result this led to inter group and tribal rivalries. This in any case created unequal distribution of resources. Favored groups were assumption the privilege of assessing important resources that allowed them to develop themselves at the expense of those outside the cultural group.This has led to the dominant groups enforcing semipolitical economical, governmental and social policies that led to unequal distribution of resources among their nations. The colonizers ofttimes violated the human rights of those people nutriment in the colonized areas. This was affected when they enacted unsporting policies that deprived the colonized subjects of their lands, resources, cultural and religious belief. They even committed eat up against their colonies. These unjust policies were seen in the form of slavery, mass murder and apartheid.The c olonial empires controlled and operated their colonized governments from abroad or through the use of a selected domestic privileged group . As a result when these nations gained independence they lacked the internal social organisation and institutions to create good governance systems. During the British Empire, there was an increase of population in the rural areas and reduced employment, which weakened the traditional status of peasants in rural settings . The expiry of lands degraded the peasants to the status of squatters.This led them to call on agricultural laborers in their own lands. The subsisting conditions of the peasants were degraded when the prices of the basic necessities other than fodder increased. Economic development depends on for sale resources, cultural changes, transformation of political systems and ways in which society adapts to the requirements of technological process. Countries that embraced their colonizers culture and political systems adapte d to a chop-chop growing economic systems.China and capital of Singapore were fast to adapt and learn the technological advances from Britain and this has put them on an economical forrard front in the world. The legacy of colonialism go away African leading with a dismay of any form of political opposition. These leading sacrificed political unity among tribes for their own good. These political leaders made accumulation of condition and political survival their priority at the expense of economic development. These political leaders sought to develop and increase subject riches rather than the peoples welfare.This has led to the dependence on the colonies and west countries for technology and development. As a result their economies declined at very elevated evaluate, they argued that horse opera knowledge and development was superior their native knowledge and therefore they should do anything achievable to adopt the western lifestyle. Colonization transfers wealth f rom the colonized countries to the colonizers leading to inhibition of flourishing development of economies of the colonized countries.Colonialists have utilise neo-colonialism to cause political psychological and moralistic damages to the colonized countries. Colonialism opened up eastmost Asia to the agricultural worlds market and all the instabilities associated with the world market forces. Peasant farmers disordered access to resources that had been an important element in making ends meet. The colonial system saturnine everything into surreptitious property pushing many people into dependence on wage labor. In Korea, Japan colonization destruct the command system that had been improving positively. approximately of the missionary schools in Korea were replaced by private schools that did not offer quality education. The education that Koreans received was based on educating them to produce better citizens of the Japanese empire of a lower level. The education given save provided the basics needed for the work that they were to perform. Korean economy grew very well under the Japanese rule between 1910 and 1945. both the mining and manufacturing industries grew more than the period to begin with the rule, but despite this the Japanese held higher skilled and highly paid jobs. all told the riches gained from the growth of the economy were distributed among the Japanese who owned most of the companies, while the Koreans remained short(p) in their own countries. Koreans played a very small part in the neoization of their economy. With the end of Japanese colonialism, the economy of Korea reduced and collapsed. Total industrial outputs decreased at very high rates when the Japanese managers and workers left(a), they also left the fiscal agricultural and banking systems in destruction.The Japanese colonial systems only favoured a few Koreans allowing them into government and financial systems that made them grow and prosper. tho majority of the companies that did not find favour suffered and collapsed. Colonialism had a bad influence on the cultural identity of the colonized counties. This gratis(p) many people from their heritage and their identity colonizers have done first by oppression where they force the colonized regions to adapt foreign languages and foreign religions. ConclusionColonialism had both negative and positive effectuate on the political, economical and social systems of the colonized regions. They eat at the cultural and traditional beliefs of the communities but still impacted positively on their economic growth. They introduced technological advances that assisted in underdeveloped countries economies. However I would say that the effects of colonialism in general were negative since they left scars in those countries that were hard to heal.Bibliography Atiyah Jeremy. The rough need southeast eastside. Asia. Rough Guides, 2002 pg. 230 Castle Gregory.Post colonial discourses. Blackwell publis hing, 2001p. 330. Christine J. Clive. Ideology and Revolution in South East Asia 1900 1980. Routledge, 2001 p. 39. Everett Heath Tom. Central Asia aspects of transition. Routledge, 2003 p. 80 Goodwin Jeff. No other way out states and revolutionary movements 1945 1991. London, 2001 pg. 200. Hack Karl.Rettig Tobias. Colonial Armies in South East Asia. Routledge 2006, pg. 195 Kiratoska H. Paul. South East Asia colonial History. South East Asia, 2001. p. 150. Lazarus Neil. matter and cultural practice in the direct colonial world.Cambridge 1999 p. 45. Mendl wolf. Japan and south East Asia. Routedge. 2001 p. 55. Milton Edwards. Contemporary politics in the lay East. Polity, 2006 p. 46. Milton Edwards Beverly. Conflicts in the Middle East since 1945. Routledge. 2001 p. 70. Pappe ilan. The modern Middle East. Routledge, 2005. p. 38. Schwarz Henry & Ray Sangeeta. A companion to Postcolonial studies Blackwell publishing 2000. p. 150. White Stephen. collectivism and its collapse. Ro utledge 2001. p. 28. Young C & Robert J. Post colonialism An historical introduction. Black well publishing 2001, p. 94.